top of page
Home Page Top_edited.jpg

Playground Surfacing Options

Playground surfacing is a critical aspect of playground design, significantly influencing safety, functionality, aesthetics, and maintenance. However, unfortunately, many folks often overlook this aspect of their playground project and treat it as an afterthought. This is a huge mistake! We encourage our customers to give the same deference to the surfacing material as they do the equipment itself.

 

Several types of playground surfacing options are available, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Choosing the right playground surfacing material depends on various factors, including budget, maintenance capabilities, aesthetic preferences, and specific safety requirements. A careful evaluation of each option's pros and cons can help make an informed decision that ensures the playground is safe and enjoyable for its users. Below is a detailed overview of the different types of playground surfacing options, highlighting the pros and cons of each:

Engineered Wood Fiber (EWF)

Pros:

  • Cost-effective compared to other surfacing materials.

  • Natural aesthetic that blends well with outdoor environments.

  • Provides good shock absorption, reducing the risk of injuries from falls.

  • Relatively easy to install and maintain.

​

Cons:

  • Requires regular maintenance to maintain depth and safety standards.

  • Can decompose over time, necessitating periodic top-up.

  • Not wheelchair-friendly without a stabilizing layer.

Engineered Wood Fiber
Rubber Mulch

Rubber Mulch

Pros:

  • Offers excellent shock absorbency, exceeding that of EWF.

  • Durable and long-lasting, with little degradation over time.

  • Available in various colors to create visually appealing designs.

  • Low maintenance, with no need for regular replenishment.

​

Cons:

  • Higher initial cost than EWF.

  • Some concerns about potential toxicity and environmental impact.

  • Can be displaced by active play, requiring occasional raking to ensure even coverage.

Poured-In-Place Rubber

Pros:

  • Highly customizable in terms of colors and designs.

  • Provides a seamless, wheelchair-accessible surface.

  • Excellent impact absorption properties.

  • Very low maintenance with no displacement issue.

​

Cons:

  • High initial installation cost.

  • Can require professional repair if damaged.

  • Surface temperature can get high in direct sunlight.

EPDM Poured in Place Rubber
Rubber Tiles

Rubber Tiles

Pros:

  • Easy to install and replace individual tiles if needed.

  • Offers a range of thicknesses for varying fall heights.

  • Wheelchair-accessible and provides a smooth surface for play.

  • Available in various colors and patterns.

​

Cons:

  • Seams between tiles can present a tripping hazard if not properly maintained.

  • High initial cost, although less than poured-in-place rubber.

  • Can be prone to shifting and may require periodic adjustments.

Synthetic Turf

Pros:

  • Offers a natural grass look without the maintenance requirements.

  • Good for areas wanting the appearance of grass with better durability.

  • Provides moderate shock absorption.

  • Drainage is typically excellent, preventing water accumulation.

​

Cons:

  • Heat absorption can make the surface hot in sunny conditions.

  • Lower impact absorption compared to rubber options, unless an additional pad is used.

  • Higher initial cost than natural grass or EWF.

Synthetic Turf
Sand

Sand

Pros:

  • Natural appearance and texture that encourages creative play.

  • Relatively inexpensive and easy to install.

  • Provides good shock absorption if maintained at the proper depth.

​

Cons:

  • Requires constant maintenance to ensure cleanliness and depth.

  • Can harden over time or when wet, reducing its effectiveness as a safety surface.

  • Not wheelchair accessible without a specialized mobility mat.

Pea Gravel

Pros:

  • Inexpensive and easy to install.

  • Drains well, reducing puddles and water play issues.

  • Natural appearance that fits well in outdoor settings.

​

Cons:

  • Not the best for impact absorption compared to other materials.

  • Can be a choking hazard for younger children.

  • Requires containment to prevent spreading and loss of depth.

Pea Gravel
bottom of page